他妈的(如果你认为我还有乖乖仔形象,请帮我加上<s> tag),前脚才说过不要再灌水,后脚就一大堆灌水回响灌进来。真不懂他们搞什么,是不是卖药的吃了春药/壮阳药兴奋剂后会变得失去理智,连我这种人流不大的blog也看上了。不过也是啦,看上我的blog绝对是你们这一生作过最正确的决定之一,而且绝对是你们的荣幸。但是,看上归看上,你们需要这样来强暴(by spamming)你们看上的一切事物吗?难怪翻开报章三天两头就有强暴案件,原来我们已经活在一个畸形的社会已久(请原谅我的后知后觉)。
Recently our English for Science unit’s lecturer posted an issue about e-learning at the college’s “e-learning” system (which is actually a blackBoard Learning System that is also used by many other colleges) and we are required to write a response to that issue. She also provided a link to a page that clearly explains about “e-learning”. Until now, I have really no idea on this issue since I am still reading that webpage while I am posting this.
If only looking at my college’s so called “e-learning” system, I really don’t like it much because it is not as useful as I expected. Blackboard Learning System is no doubt a good system handling “e-learning” things but it is not being well used at my college. I myself prefer looking for information at another websites rather than the e-learning system because there are almost nothing provided by our lecturer through the system except for some lecture notes / tutorial questions / assignment questions etc. I have a friend studying at another college and I heard from him that he can get a lot more things through their college BlackBoard System besides notes / assignments etc. And the participation of his lecturer is much better compared to my college. I found that sometimes it is very rare to see any lecturer to join in our discussion in the discussion board and probably this is why Blackboard System is not popular in my college.
But these are only some problems that only occur in my college, and this doesn’t mean that they will happen in other colleges as well. Therefore these cannot be the only points in my response to the issue, *sigh*. Now I would need to start thinking what to write and post them this Friday since I do not have much spare time because the units I took in this semester are quite tough (at least 4 credit hours) and I am definitely don’t wish the same thing happened as the “Introductory to Discrete Mathematics” unit last semester.
如果世界上有人策划一宗完美的罪案,你有什么感想?刚才看电视,某时事评论节目,看到主持人问某新闻从业员一个关于他有没有采访过完美的罪案觉得很有趣。什么是完美的罪案?如果一切都完美的话,那么就表示一切看上去很正常,那么我们看起来很正常的事件是不是要称之为罪案?如果很正常的事件也叫做罪案,那么这样还完美吗?完美的罪案,在我看来,就如说:“有缺陷的完美”一样有趣。有趣不在于他是不是符合我个人的思维逻辑,而是因为这样的问题往往能够刺激我们的思维。
老實說,上星期我到底在忙什麼,其實一直到現在還是說不上來。真的要說,我只是知道參與了一個喪禮,就這樣。這喪禮是以道教儀式為主,佛教意識為輔,兩家教義主旨都不太一樣,甚至在一些關鍵點上還有點相衝,所以其實我有點在擔心死者若泉下有知是不是會很困惑。個人好歹也是個科學家,所以這些理解什麼的背後意義並沒有太在乎。說實在真的沒有人知道,也沒有證據顯示這些宗教儀式說的死後世界真正存在,所以若冒犯了不好意思。
新聞機構,很多時候都是扮演把事情報導出來讓公眾知道的角色。這些事情,可以是芝麻綠豆的小事,也可以是隔壁老王養的小雞早夭到達外太空發現一個新的行星之類的大事。但是如果一家新聞機構本身成了新聞焦點,那一定就是大事。在我們生活的這個什麼都能的國度,就是大事中的大事。你看看哪份大報明年拿不到出版准證,那是大事。據實報導哪個官講話辭不達意,導致本人惱羞成怒出來說記者聽錯,那也是大事