第一个故事，是我朋友的丈夫，在回乡的路途上被交警以超速为由被勒令停下。可是事实上，我朋友的丈夫却没有超速，可是警员却非常坚决地认为他有。后来我朋友的丈夫就很不耐烦地说等到照片寄到他家他就还那张传票，然后警员就离开了，事后也没有收到传票（可是我不知道是还没有还是超速一说根本就是捏造）。在当时，我第一个感觉就是，这个警员是不是真的一位警察？因为如果是真的警察的话，没有理由会理屈的，如果不是警察的话，我可能应该要为他们感到庆幸了，至少那位假警员没有攻击他们。
我并不是在扮单纯，可是这个社会上几乎什么事都可能发生。尤其是现在这个时局，假货猖狂，翻版黑心货假牛奶假男友假月饼假叉叉窿窿都有，更何况是假警员，唯独是歹徒是没有假的（除了演员）。
第二个故事，是发生在一个生意人身上，据说一分钟几百万上落。这次，这个生意人确实是超速，被警察停下。然后这位警察就有意无意的缠着他不放（我不想说他们要贿金，毕竟警察是需要权威的。我心想他有没有并不代表我要强迫你们认同我想法，所以还是不写到那么负面。而且最重要的是，这个故事我是听回来的，真实度有多少，我并没有很清楚。所以留言着不要太激动），后来那个生意人干脆就要他直接给他传票好了。后来她的总结是，有钱的人通常中传票的几率不高，因为他们宁愿还传票。而且他们如果因为被警察耽误了生意，警察是不是能够赔偿？听起来很合理吧？可是后来我想了想却是非常的似是而非。
想一想，是谁先犯了错？是警察缠着那个生意人所以是错的？我不知道你这样想，是不是因为警员在你的心目中已经变成了一个负面的一个人物。但是，不要忘了，实际上，如果不是生意人超速，就不会被警员停下（警员是否有额外的意图不在讨论之列）。就算是几百万上下，如果要是因为你赶时间，然后超速，要是一个不小心撞倒人，或发生了交通意外，往往你连累的，不只是你自己，更可能的是，无辜人的生命。这种想法会不会也是一个间接造成社会问题滋生的根源呢？没有人知道，除非是由社会学家做了长期的研究才可能有所肯定。
The first story was about her husband. Her husband was stopped by a policeman while he was on the way back to his hometown claiming that he was speeding over the limit. But he wasn’t even near to the limit, therefore he insisted the police to send him the proof and summon and refused to pay on the spot. The first thing came to my mind after listening to her story was “is the cop a real one?”. I wasn’t sure about it, but it was very likely.
I’m not trying to act selfish though, because in this kind of society nowadays, it is possible to have fake stuff like pirated stuff, fake food products, fake jewelries etc. except for fake criminals (I’m not talking about actors/actresses).
The second story was about a rich businessman that has business that get profit/loss in millions in minutes. He was speeding and the cop stopped him. I do not wish to say the cop has a hidden reason for stopping him because it is not fair for projecting my thought of police in public to force you guys to accept my thought that they are not necessarily innocent. The image of police is very very important and I do not wish a story like this will affect their image although not very likely since I do not have that kind of visitor statistics XD. The businessman also insisted the police to issue him a summon. She later concluded that rich people won’t be stopped by a police that frequent because they rather pay for the summon. And they often give the excuse like “Can those policemen afford to pay back if I suffer loss while I am stopped by them?”. It sounds very reasonable, isn’t it? But I found it isn’t.
Who was the one that wasn’t following the rules? Was it the policeman because he stopped a businessman that might have his business ruined at anytime? If you are thinking in this way, I am not sure whether this is the mental set that is shaped by your experiences and you have a very negative kind of image for policemen. But, don’t you forget that the businessman was the one who sped and got caught (the “real” reason behind the scene of the policeman is not the scope of discussion) . Nobody else cares whether his/her business suffers loss, if he/she kept speeding and didn’t get caught and involved in car accident, he/she is most likely to cause injury or even worse than that to innocent people. I dunno whether this kind of thought is one of the causes why social problems keep raising, nobody except those experts that conducted researches on this.
RSS - Posts
首先还是先提醒一下，尽量不要分开一直post，不然spam blocker会挡住你们的post
Frankie>是正常的，我们的psychology class讲师有提过
Regina>用关系的更加抵死，鬼不望他们撞死算了
janet>有性格